Largest City In Minnesota By Area

Largest City in Minnesota by Area

The largest city in Minnesota by area is Hibbing, a historic mining community in St. Louis County’s Mesabi Iron Range, spanning 186.5 square miles of total land and water area per 2020 U.S. Census data. While the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul are the state’s most populous urban centers, Hibbing’s sprawling footprint outpaces every other incorporated municipality in Minnesota, a legacy of its central role in the state’s iron mining industry. This unique size distinction often surprises residents and visitors alike, as Hibbing’s population of just over 16,000 is a fraction of the hundreds of thousands living in Minnesota’s larger metro areas.

How Hibbing Earned Its Title as Minnesota’s Largest City by Area

Hibbing’s unusual size is rooted entirely in the rapid expansion of iron mining on the Mesabi Iron Range in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Worth adding: the area that would become Hibbing was first settled in 1893, after prospectors discovered massive deposits of taconite and high-grade iron ore in the surrounding hills. The town was named after Frank Hibbing, a German immigrant who donated land for the town site, and by 1900, it had grown to a population of 2,000, fueled by the booming mining industry.

The real driver of Hibbing’s massive area was the Hull-Rust-Mahoning Open Pit Iron Mine, first opened in 1895. Now, as one of the richest iron ore deposits in the world, the mine expanded rapidly, and by the 1910s, mine operators realized the original town of Hibbing sat directly above a massive untapped ore body. Rather than abandon the mine, mining companies and city leaders made the unprecedented decision to relocate the entire town 2 miles south to make way for mine expansion.

Between 1919 and 1921, crews moved 185 homes, 20 businesses, three churches, and a school, using a system of steel rollers, horses, and later trucks to transport structures along a specially built road. 5 million at the time (equivalent to over $25 million today), and the city annexed thousands of acres of surrounding land to accommodate the new town site and the expanding mine. This single act of relocation and annexation doubled the city’s footprint, and subsequent expansions to include additional mining claims pushed Hibbing’s total area to its current 186.Day to day, the relocation cost over $1. 5 square miles. Unlike most Minnesota cities, which grow outward incrementally as residential subdivisions spread, Hibbing’s size was determined almost entirely by industrial need, creating a sprawling municipality with a tiny population density.

Key Geographic and Demographic Facts About Hibbing

To understand just how unusual Hibbing’s size is, it helps to break down its core statistics:

• Total area: 186.5 square miles (482.5 km²), with 99.5% land area and 0.5% water area, almost all of which is small lakes and streams
• Land area alone: 185.6 square miles, which is still larger than the entire combined area of Minneapolis and St. Paul
• Population (2020 Census): 16,214, giving a population density of just 87 people per square mile, compared to Minneapolis’s 7,964 people per square mile
• County: St. Louis County, the largest county in Minnesota by area, which also contains Duluth and the majority of the Mesabi Iron Range
• Notable landmark: The Hull-Rust-Mahoning Open Pit Iron Mine covers 1,591 acres within city limits, has produced over 1.6 billion tons of iron ore since 1895, and is visible from space
• Location: 70 miles northwest of Duluth, 200 miles north of Minneapolis, and 15 miles from the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness

Hibbing is also home to several notable cultural institutions, including Hibbing Community College, part of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system, and Hibbing High School, a National Historic Landmark built in 1920 with a 1,800-seat auditorium that once hosted performers like Bob Dylan, who grew up in Hibbing. The city’s economy remains tied to mining, with taconite processing plants and supporting industries making up the majority of local employment.

How Hibbing Compares to Other Major Minnesota Cities by Area

Minnesota’s city area rankings often cause confusion, as most residents assume Duluth, the state’s fourth-most populous city, holds the size title. On the flip side, even when comparing land area only, Hibbing’s 185.Duluth’s total area of 87.Practically speaking, 6 square miles of land far outpaces Duluth’s 67. Because of that, 7 square miles includes 19. Because of that, this misconception stems from Duluth’s high profile: it is a major port on Lake Superior, home to the University of Minnesota Duluth, and a popular tourist destination. 9 square miles of water along its Lake Superior shoreline, which contributes to its perceived size. 8 square miles of land.

The top five largest cities in Minnesota by total area, per 2020 Census data, are:

1. Hibbing: 186.5 square miles
2. Duluth: 87.7 square miles (less than half the size of Hibbing)
3. Minneapolis: 57.5 square miles
4. St. Paul: 56.2 square miles
5. Rochester: 54.6 square miles

Notably, the combined total area of Minneapolis and St. Still, paul, the Twin Cities core, is just 113. 7 square miles, which is 72.Plus, 8 square miles smaller than Hibbing alone. On top of that, even when including the water area that makes up nearly 23% of Duluth’s footprint, Hibbing still maintains a lead of nearly 99 square miles. The only incorporated places in Minnesota larger than Hibbing are unorganized territories, which are not classified as cities under U.S. Census definitions.

For more on this topic, read our article on x 1 3 x 3 or check out zen color color by number downloadable content.

Why Does Area Size Matter for Minnesota Cities?

A city’s total area has a major impact on its operations and budget, a reality that is especially challenging for Hibbing. Think about it: minnesota’s climate brings heavy snowfall, averaging over 60 inches per year in the Iron Range, meaning the city must plow and maintain over 186 square miles of roads with a tax base of just 16,000 residents. For comparison, Minneapolis plows just 57 square miles of roads with a tax base of over 429,000 residents, meaning its per-capita snow removal costs are a fraction of Hibbing’s.

Large area also affects emergency services: Hibbing’s fire department and police department must cover a footprint larger than many entire counties, leading to longer response times in the city’s outlying areas. Even so, on the other hand, Hibbing’s massive size allows for extensive industrial zoning, which has preserved space for mining operations and related industries that form the backbone of the local economy. Many smaller Minnesota cities struggle to find space for industrial development, but Hibbing has ample land to support new projects.

Common Misconceptions About Minnesota’s Largest City by Area

The most persistent myth about Minnesota city sizes is that Duluth holds the area title. Another common mistake is counting only land area for some cities and total area for others: if Duluth’s water area is excluded, its land area is 67.And in those filtered rankings, Duluth is indeed the largest city by area, as it is the next-largest city overall. 8 square miles, while Hibbing’s land area remains 185.On top of that, this is often due to rankings that only include cities with populations over 50,000, which exclude Hibbing. 6 square miles, preserving Hibbing’s lead.

Some residents also assume that Minneapolis or St. That said, both cities are densely developed, with little undeveloped land left within their borders, leading to their smaller footprints. Paul must be larger by area, given their status as the state’s economic and cultural hubs. Hibbing’s lack of dense development is a direct result of its industrial origins, which prioritized mine expansion over residential clustering.

FAQ

1. Is Hibbing really the largest city in Minnesota by area? Yes, per the 2020 U.S. Census ranking of all incorporated municipalities in Minnesota, Hibbing’s 186.5 square mile total area is the largest in the state. This ranking includes all cities regardless of population size.

2. Why is Hibbing so much larger than Duluth? Hibbing’s size is driven by the expansion of the Hull-Rust-Mahoning iron mine, which required the city to annex large swaths of land and relocate its entire town center in the early 20th century. Duluth’s size is shaped by its Lake Superior shoreline, but its total area is less than half of Hibbing’s.

3. What is the largest city in Minnesota by population? Minneapolis is the most populous city, with over 429,000 residents as of 2020, followed by St. Paul with 303,820 residents and Duluth with 86,697 residents.

4. Can visitors tour the mine that shaped Hibbing’s size? Yes, the Hull-Rust-Mahoning Mine View in Hibbing offers a public viewing platform overlooking the open pit, with informational displays about the mine’s history and its impact on the city’s growth.

Conclusion

Hibbing’s status as the largest city in Minnesota by area is a unique distinction that reflects the state’s industrial history as much as its geography. Practically speaking, while it may not have the population or name recognition of the Twin Cities or Duluth, its sprawling 186. For travelers exploring the Mesabi Iron Range, a stop in Hibbing offers a chance to see this history firsthand, from the relocated historic homes to the massive open pit mine that shaped the city’s borders. Practically speaking, 5 square mile footprint tells the story of Minnesota’s iron mining boom, and the unprecedented choices made to support one of the world’s most productive iron mines. Understanding Hibbing’s size helps paint a fuller picture of Minnesota’s diverse municipal landscape, where industrial legacy and geographic chance have created one of the most unusual city footprints in the United States.