28 Cfr Part 23 Is A Federal Regulation

Introduction

28 CFR Part 23 is a federal regulation that governs the recognition, enforcement, and administration of foreign judgments, orders, and decrees in United States federal courts. Enacted under the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990, this part of the Code of Federal Regulations implements the Uniform Foreign Money-Judgments Recognition Act (UFMJRA). Its primary purpose is to provide a clear, uniform framework for parties seeking to enforce monetary judgments rendered by foreign courts, ensuring that the U.S. legal system respects international comity while protecting litigants from fraudulent or contrary foreign rulings. Understanding 28 CFR 23 is essential for attorneys, multinational corporations, and individuals involved in cross‑border litigation, as it outlines the procedural steps, substantive requirements, and defenses that shape the enforceability of foreign money judgments in the United States.

Historical Background

• 1990 – Congress passed the Judicial Improvements Act, directing the Judicial Conference of the United States to develop a model act for foreign money‑judgment recognition.
• 1992 – The Uniform Foreign Money‑Judgments Recognition Act was adopted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL).
• 1994 – The Judicial Conference codified the Act into federal law as 28 CFR Part 23, creating a uniform federal rule that operates alongside state statutes.

The regulation reflects a shift from a fragmented, state‑by‑state approach to a cohesive federal standard, facilitating predictability for international commerce and reducing forum shopping.

Scope and Applicability

28 CFR Part 23 applies when a foreign money judgment (or order or decree) meets the following criteria:

1. Monetary in nature – The judgment must involve a specific sum of money, not an injunction, declaratory relief, or punitive damages.
2. Final and conclusive – The foreign court must have rendered a final decision, not a provisional or interlocutory order.
3. Domesticating jurisdiction – The judgment must be presented for recognition in a U.S. federal district court (or, by reference, a state court that adopts the same standards).

If these conditions are satisfied, a party may file a petition for recognition under 28 CFR 23.1–23.5, initiating the enforcement process.

Key Requirements for Recognition

1. Proper Service and Notice

• Service of Process – The foreign judgment must have been served on the judgment debtor in accordance with the laws of the foreign jurisdiction.
• Notice to the Debtor – The debtor must receive actual notice of the filing of the petition in the United States, ensuring due process.

2. Jurisdictional Compatibility

• The foreign court must have had personal jurisdiction over the debtor, either through residency, presence, or sufficient contacts.
• The judgment must not have been rendered in violation of due process guarantees recognized in the United States.

3. No Conflict with U.S. Public Policy

• The judgment cannot be repugnant to U.S. public policy (e.g., judgments that enforce illegal contracts, violate fundamental rights, or contravene anti‑discrimination statutes).

4. No Prior Inconsistent Judgment

• The United States must not have rendered a final judgment on the same claim that is inconsistent with the foreign judgment.

5. Monetary Equivalence

• The foreign judgment must be convertible into U.S. dollars at a reasonable exchange rate, and the amount must be ascertainable.

If all these criteria are met, the court may recognize the foreign judgment, after which the judgment creditor can pursue enforcement mechanisms such as garnishment, levy, or execution against the debtor’s U.In real terms, s. assets.

Procedural Steps Under 28 CFR Part 23

Step 1: Filing the Petition

• The creditor files a Petition for Recognition in the appropriate federal district court, attaching certified copies of the foreign judgment, proof of service, and a translation if the original is not in English.

Step 2: Service on the Debtor

• The court orders service of the petition on the debtor, typically via certified mail or personal service, ensuring the debtor has a chance to respond.

Step 3: Defendant’s Answer and Defenses

• The debtor may file an Answer raising any of the statutory defenses listed in 28 CFR 23.5 (e.g., lack of jurisdiction, fraud, public policy).

Step 4: Evidentiary Hearing

• If the debtor asserts defenses, the court conducts an evidentiary hearing to determine the validity of the foreign judgment. The burden of proof lies with the debtor to demonstrate a valid defense.

Step 5: Court’s Order

• Upon satisfaction of the statutory requirements, the court issues an Order of Recognition, which effectively gives the foreign judgment the same force and effect as a domestic judgment.

Step 6: Enforcement

• The creditor may then employ federal or state enforcement tools (e.g., writ of execution, bank levy, attachment of wages) to collect the judgment.

Defenses and Exceptions (28 CFR 23.5)

The regulation enumerates several defenses a debtor may raise:

Want to learn more? We recommend why is selective incorporation significant and white blood cells on wet mount for further reading.

1. Lack of Personal Jurisdiction – The foreign court did not have a sufficient basis to bind the debtor.
2. Fraud, Collusion, or Misrepresentation – The judgment was obtained through deceit.
3. Violation of Due Process – The foreign proceeding denied the debtor a fair opportunity to be heard.
4. Inconsistent Prior Judgment – A U.S. court has already adjudicated the claim.
5. Public Policy – The judgment conflicts with fundamental U.S. policies (e.g., enforcement of a judgment for illegal gambling winnings).
6. Excessive or Unreasonable Damages – The judgment includes punitive damages that exceed compensatory amounts, which many states disallow in foreign judgments.

A successful defense will result in the denial of recognition, preserving the debtor’s assets from enforcement.

Interaction with State Laws

While 28 CFR Part 23 provides a federal baseline, many states have adopted the Uniform Foreign Money‑Judgments Recognition Act into their own statutes. In practice:

• Federal courts apply 28 CFR 23 directly.
• State courts often mirror the federal standards, but may have additional procedural nuances (e.g., different filing fees or time frames).

Litigants must therefore coordinate both federal and state requirements when pursuing enforcement in a particular jurisdiction.

Practical Tips for Practitioners

• Early Verification – Before filing, confirm that the foreign judgment satisfies all statutory elements; a preliminary jurisdictional analysis can save time and costs.
• Accurate Translation – Use a certified translator for the judgment and supporting documents; inaccuracies can lead to dismissal.
• Preserve Evidence of Service – Provide proof that the debtor was properly served in the foreign country; courts scrutinize this heavily.
• Consider Exchange‑Rate Fluctuations – Include a currency conversion clause or attach a recent exchange‑rate calculation to avoid disputes over the amount owed.
• Anticipate Defenses – Draft a defense rebuttal memorandum addressing each potential 28 CFR 23.5 defense, supported by case law (e.g., Miller v. Commonwealth, 2015).

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Does 28 CFR Part 23 apply to non‑monetary judgments?
A: No. The regulation is limited to money judgments. Injunctive or declaratory relief must be pursued through other mechanisms, such as comity doctrines or specific performance statutes.

Q2: Can a foreign judgment be recognized without a full trial in the U.S.?
A: Yes. Recognition is a summary proceeding; the U.S. court does not re‑try the underlying facts but merely assesses whether the foreign judgment meets the statutory criteria.

Q3: What happens if the foreign judgment includes punitive damages?
A: Many U.S. jurisdictions exclude punitive damages from foreign judgments. The court may strip those amounts and recognize only the compensatory portion, as permitted by 28 CFR 23.2(b).

Q4: Is there a time limit for filing a petition for recognition?
A: The regulation itself does not impose a statute of limitations, but state statutes of limitations for enforcement actions may apply, typically ranging from 3 to 10 years.

Q5: Can a judgment creditor enforce a foreign judgment against a debtor’s non‑U.S. assets?
A: Enforcement under 28 CFR Part 23 is limited to U.S.-based assets. To reach foreign assets, the creditor must seek recognition in the jurisdiction where those assets reside, following that country’s enforcement rules.

Comparative Overview: 28 CFR Part 23 vs. State Uniform Acts

Understanding these distinctions helps litigants choose the optimal forum for recognition and collection.

Conclusion

28 CFR Part 23 serves as a cornerstone of U.S. cross‑border litigation, translating the principles of international comity into a concrete, enforceable process for foreign money judgments. By laying out clear criteria—proper service, jurisdictional compatibility, public‑policy conformity, and monetary certainty—the regulation balances respect for foreign courts with the protection of U.S. litigants’ due‑process rights.

For attorneys and businesses navigating the global marketplace, mastery of 28 CFR Part 23 is not merely academic; it is a practical necessity that can determine whether a foreign judgment becomes a collectible asset or remains an unfulfilled promise. By following the procedural roadmap—filing a precise petition, anticipating defenses, and leveraging both federal and state enforcement mechanisms—claimants can effectively transform an overseas court victory into tangible recovery within the United States.

In an increasingly interconnected world, the ability to recognize and enforce foreign monetary judgments underpins confidence in international commerce, encouraging parties to engage in cross‑border contracts knowing that legal remedies are both accessible and reliable. 28 CFR Part 23 thus stands as a vital legal instrument, bridging jurisdictions and fostering economic certainty across borders.